Oh the gossip!
Old school mean. But understandable so... haha!

I'd somehow like to see that catfight back in the day! I guess Miss B wouldn't stand a chance, hhehehe.

...
See, know I've shot off my mouth! Darn it!

I like Etta James saying Beyonce is gonna get her ass whipped if she keeps singing her song... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZAqKv86Clg

Fierce Play said:

I completely agree. I get shit every time I bring this discussion up. Granted I love some of The Clash's tunes but there is something phony about strummer when he is being interviewed. I can't quite pin point it. But watch both The Ramones documentary ( End of the Century) and The Clash documentary (The Future is Unwritten) back to back and you might see what I mean.)

Blaine said:

Who cares.

Lord Muck!! said:

I lived thru the punk thing in the UK and in my view The Clash were punk. Punk in itself didn't last that long, but punks of that time did. What they created could be described any way you like. The fact is that the people involved in the early British punk movement were creative, active, making statements, energetic and kicking out the crap. The fact that they flew off in different directions is a testament to how great the movement was at the time; the fact that these bands were not tied down to a narrow idea of what punk should be is all to their credit. The bands that followed that called themselves punk (the little brothers' bands), and any other band that reckons to play punk rock since, can't hold a candle to the people in this early movement in UK and other scenes round the world. So the question of whether The Clash are punk is irrelevant really, whether their later albums were punk is also. Punk was about a lot more than music, it was a revolution. These recent bands that think they're making punk rock are about as punk as my arse.

Who cares.

I lived thru the punk thing in the UK and in my view The Clash were punk. Punk in itself didn't last that long, but punks of that time did. What they created could be described any way you like. The fact is that the people involved in the early British punk movement were creative, active, making statements, energetic and kicking out the crap. The fact that they flew off in different directions is a testament to how great the movement was at the time; the fact that these bands were not tied down to a narrow idea of what punk should be is all to their credit. The bands that followed that called themselves punk (the little brothers' bands), and any other band that reckons to play punk rock since, can't hold a candle to the people in this early movement in UK and other scenes round the world. So the question of whether The Clash are punk is irrelevant really, whether their later albums were punk is also. Punk was about a lot more than music, it was a revolution. These recent bands that think they're making punk rock are about as punk as my arse.

Slovenly Recordings said:

have you heard our 45 rpm releases by the ridiculous trio? it's instrumental tuba/ drums marching band sounding version of songs by the stooges. no lie. amazing!

something quite new, band only formed in January this year www.myspace.com/theegravemen

You want new or interesting music, just line yor pointy head up with Japan.
Start with the Boredoms and John Zorn's Tzadic record label and you are off on an all out aural assault.
I don't claim to know much about Japanese music bit all the stuff I do listen too is just crazy.

It'd definitely be between The Sonics "Here are the Sonics" or The Kingsmen "In Person"

I would have to let the ipod die.

Gather up some coconuts and bamboo, carve up some palm stumps and build myself a castaways style one man band. Keep myself drunk and entertained.

Wild Thing - The Troggs (from Andover) - Easy! next question...

Real Kids - S/t.

Old school UK punk?

This place is void-free! kopper said:

I think the only void we have in our lineup right now is a Latin American show that focused on music from Mexico southward and including all of South America. We'll have a new Aussie show coming soon, so that'll be taken care of.

I think the only void we have in our lineup right now is a Latin American show that focused on music from Mexico southward and including all of South America. We'll have a new Aussie show coming soon, so that'll be taken care of.

Sure is! And sometimes depending on yer speakers initial strength, that will only make them sound better! Adding a live fuzz sound effect to eveeeerything you play thru them, hhaha. High Lord Mardy Pune said:

I think the idea is they will fuck yer speakers

I know what you mean mate. I remember the band I am involved in supporting them in Adelaide, Aust 2 years ago....and it was certainly an experience in volume and chaos

I think the idea is they will fuck yer speakers

Hey man, you just gotta play them loud and even louder until your ears are bleeding and your fucking speakers are blasting off. That's the only way. Can't play these ones low , doesn't make no sense !

Oh yeah I know that feeling! Whenever it'll be here, I'm siked for the big #70! kopper said:

Thanks! Although lately I've been too busy with other stuff to work on a new episode.
IDON MINE said:

Just dropping by to yell that SAVAGE KICK is Awesome Radiomaking - even if it's a podcast ;)=
Great rythm to the whole programm, excellent mood. And it's totally alive and original! Yes, I love the Savage Kick!
HAW HAW!

Thanks! Although lately I've been too busy with other stuff to work on a new episode. IDON MINE said:

Just dropping by to yell that SAVAGE KICK is Awesome Radiomaking - even if it's a podcast ;)=
Great rythm to the whole programm, excellent mood. And it's totally alive and original! Yes, I love the Savage Kick!

HAW HAW!

Good to hear - Thanks for the technical heads up! Absolutely thought of asking the bands and venues along, although bootlegs are great, I think it makes it more fun for everybody in to have them know it. The audience thing is something that can bring a lot to a recording. There is this great Solomon Burke live album where the show is almost a symbiotic experience between the band and the people in the room. I'll see if I can catch something in the distant future and will be sure to hand it in. 'Love that show and it's great to have it as a podcast! kopper said:

I think it depends on the band. There should be some buzz about it at least. Although I'm more inclined to be interested in more rarities, like great recordings of classic, storied bands of the past. But that's not to say I wouldn't include a live recording of a great up-and-coming one if the quality was good enough. By the way, the best way to record a live show is to have a mix of a live mic and a direct input from the sound board. Ask the band permission to record the show first, then talk to the sound man. Bring a recording device and plug it into the sound board, and then have a room mic so you can capture, well, the sound of the room, including people cheering, clapping and stuff. Then mix both recordings together and you'll be pleasantly surprised at the results if done correctly.

I think it depends on the band. There should be some buzz about it at least. Although I'm more inclined to be interested in more rarities, like great recordings of classic, storied bands of the past. But that's not to say I wouldn't include a live recording of a great up-and-coming one if the quality was good enough. By the way, the best way to record a live show is to have a mix of a live mic and a direct input from the sound board. Ask the band permission to record the show first, then talk to the sound man. Bring a recording device and plug it into the sound board, and then have a room mic so you can capture, well, the sound of the room, including people cheering, clapping and stuff. Then mix both recordings together and you'll be pleasantly surprised at the results if done correctly.