Forums » Shakin' Street

List of newest posts

    • November 12, 2007 8:09 AM CST
    • OK, so I'm still trying to get to the bottom of this... is the copyright law as it applies to music recordings somehow that different from the copyright law as it applies to films and other published works (i.e. allowing films and [I'm assuming] books to be rented, but not allowing this for music)? I realize WHY rentals for movies works better and yadda yadda yadda, but that still doesn't mean it wouldn't work at all for renting music... that is unless the law is written in such a way as to totally make that unlawful to do so.

    • November 12, 2007 6:08 AM CST
    • I wasn't talking about absolutes here. Of course there are a few people who will watch a lot of movies over an over again and we all have a couple of movies that we like to watch again and again. But thats not the norm. Most people will only watch a movie once.

    • November 11, 2007 8:06 PM CST
    • Bill sent me this link. It HAS been done before!

    • November 11, 2007 8:04 PM CST
    • I dunno about that. There are some movies that I'll watch multiple times. Hell, I remember one weekend a friend of mine and I watched "Strange Brew" and "Slapshot" about a dozen times each.

    • November 11, 2007 7:56 PM CST
    • This has been thought of before. But they were shut down pretty quickly because it's illegal to rent out music recordings. Besides people would just be ripping everything to their harddrives anyway. The reason rentals work so well for movies and not music is because people use them differently. Movies are most often watched once and music is listened to over and over again. So it's much more economical to own music (because it's used over and over) than it is to own a movie which typically only gets used once.

    • November 11, 2007 3:51 PM CST
    • check this out...books are the next frontier of free access if Google gets its way...which I ain't entirely opposed to...wish something similar to this was possible fer music...and here we are back to Kopper's original dream idea.

    • November 11, 2007 3:47 PM CST
    • Very true but I'm willing to bet that libraries can get movies on DVD a helluva lot cheaper that what Blockbuster has to fork over.

    • November 11, 2007 2:52 PM CST
    • Well plus there isn't a huge debacle going on with people copying books like there is with file sharing/bootlegging.

    • November 11, 2007 2:31 PM CST
    • I'm pretty sure libraries still need to purchase books, videos and records/CDs (unless they're donated).

    • November 11, 2007 1:56 PM CST
    • That's true but goin' back to my "library" thread, couldn't anyone just "bootleg" a book by photocopyin' the whole thing? The cost for a rental company to purchase a video fer instance, due to its mass commercial use, is crazy, yet fer libraries it is much cheaper (if there is any added fee at all) fer the same video even though "pirates" can dupe both the same...cuz libraries are non-profit they can get away with alot more (though they still are accountable to copyright law and the such) and that's why we need a World Music Library (...yeah that sounds great and hippy)
      ...a non-profit Netflix?
      ...now I'm just ramblin'......

    • November 11, 2007 1:44 PM CST
    • I think it would be easier for bootleggers to rip the shit off. Maybe that's why?

    • November 11, 2007 12:10 PM CST
    • Ah yes, that's true... forgot about the "renting vs. borrowing" aspect. But you can also check out movies from the library. I guess I'm still missing what the big difference is between renting movies vs. albums, but then again I'm still pretty hungover from last night and my brain's not quite firing on all cylinders just yet.

    • November 11, 2007 12:02 PM CST
    • Hate to mince meat here but unless yer library charges ya to check out CDs (late fees don't count!) yer not really rentin'...yer just borrowin' ...now if libraries started carryin' cool garagepunk CDs, ya could just inter-library loan a kickin' CD fer free (here again unless yer library charges fer that sort thing...and they shouldn't unless they're money-hungry) ...not knockin' yer idea, but once commerical interests and the RIAA get involved we might as well call the whole party off

      On an aside: Once I get a TV set (again) I just may join Netflix!

    • November 11, 2007 11:41 AM CST
    • I friggin' love Netflix, especially now that I've figured out how to have separate queues for my own movies (separate from my wife and kid's lists, I mean). I also really dig how it also gives you the option to watch a movie right there on site, right away. It makes me wish there was a (legit) site like that where you could "rent" albums from bands, so that they're sent to you in little mailers. Then you can sign in and rate them, and recommend them to your friends and all that. Is there such an animal? Or is there something (oh, like our good friends at the RIAA) that is preventing such a website from starting? I mean, you can rent CDs from the library, so what's keeping this sort of service from coming online?

    • November 11, 2007 9:50 PM CST
    • If you add your show or event of interest to Upcoming.org, you can then send it to our GaragePunk.com - Canada group there so it appears in the event list at the top of this group. Here's a step-by-step on how to do this: 1) Go to www.upcoming.org and log in (if you have a Yahoo ID, just use this, otherwise you'll have to create one). 2) Next, click the "Groups" tab (there, not here) and search for the "GaragePunk.com - Canada" group and join it. 3) After you've logged in and joined the group, click on "Add New Event" and then type in all of the details, including any links to band/venue sites, images, etc. Then click the "PREVIEW" button at the bottom. 4) On the next screen, make sure all of the info is correct, then down on the right side you'll see "Groups" and under that, "Send to group?" Click that, and a menu will appear showing the groups you belong to. Select "GaragePunk.com - Canada" and that will add it to this group. (If you don't see this group listed there, that means you didn't join the group first... read #2 above again.) You're all done! Just repeat the above steps for any other events you'd like to add.

    • November 11, 2007 8:12 PM CST
    • Yeah, I thought I still had the URL at the time I wrote that.

    • November 11, 2007 1:36 PM CST
    • Oh OK, I guess I was confused about the "i'm not at liberty to let others hear it" part.

    • November 11, 2007 11:34 AM CST
    • Yeah, I was a bit let down by Beachhead, too. That's not to say there weren't a few good songs on it, but overall it wasn't as good as I'd hoped. Do You Swing? was much better...

    • November 11, 2007 11:29 AM CST
    • I wanna hear this so badly now ...though I was let down by Beachhead (songwriting-wise and sonically), I have I hopes fer this new blast from the 'Tones!

    • November 11, 2007 10:08 AM CST
    • Yep, that's how I heard it. Someone gave me the URL that took me directly to the 'Tones record. Dunno where I put it, though. Pretty sure it has something to do with the YepRoc Radio link, which seems to pick a record at random. I'm just not sure what the direct link is to the 'Tones record...Or even if that's the one that will come up if the randomizer chooses the Fleshtones.

    • November 11, 2007 9:53 AM CST
    • I've heard it.

    • November 10, 2007 6:11 PM CST
    • Jim Diamond produced half of it in Detroit (Ivan Julian the other half in NYC) and his stuff sounds like Beachhead sonically. The Julian stuff is really junky and cool-sounding, too.

    • November 11, 2007 1:40 PM CST
    • Cute and smart, hubba hubba.

    • November 11, 2007 11:54 AM CST
    • Silly question: What's the screen name of the CEO (as to friend-request and harrass her about garagepunk...haha)?