60s punk is nice. but it would seem to describe only part of the genre.
don't you think the term rock and roll is pretty meaningless today unless you attach a long train of adjectives?
so greg shaw says he invented the term?
TK said:
here's where the term originated (from a Greg Shaw interview). maybe this will help:This is tricky, because since the late '50s at least one heard about musicians and bands who practiced in garages in the suburbs. In the '80s, metal bands thought they came from the garage. Maybe some of them still do. Then of course there are all the insane new meanings that have been attached to the word by house music and (more recently) world music folks.
Nevertheless, there was a moment in history when I sat down and had a conversation with myself. Guys like me and Lenny and Lester etc had been talking about "punk" in terms of '60s bands since Dave Marsh coined the usage in his Question Mark article in Creem in 1969 (I'm glad that was finally settled!). But by 1976 it was very clear that the word "punk" was going to start meaning something else to a whole lotta people, and as I was actively writing about and working with "'60s punk rock" I felt it would be better to have a less confusing monicker. I decided on "garage rock" and I think I even wrote an essay or a liner note or something explaining why. Thenceforth I used it exclusively in all my efforts.
Of course there are no rules in language. You can say "'60s garage punk" or even "'60s punk" and most people now will know what you mean. But remember that in 1976 there were no Pebbles albums yet, no revival bands, no body of research. All we had was Nuggets, those "artyfacts from the first psychedelic era". So for its time, it was a distinction I felt was useful.
I don't know who if anyone picked up this usage; it was mainly for my convenience, as a historian and also as a marketer of niche products. For all I know a hundred other people had the same soliloquy on the same afternoon. But I remember it clearly.
And that's all I can tell you!
so garage is basically '60s punk. '60s punk was rock and roll bashed out by kids in their parents' garages and basements. it has a certain distinctive sound to it, rawness, amateur, primitive, loud. you get fuzz, distortion, reverb, organ (vox, farfisa, hammond, whatever) plus wild lyrics & vocals. it's the same today. no, it's not as easily "defined" as reggae because it includes a lot of different influences and styles and can sound very different from band to band, but the roots are always there. the beat, the instrumentation, the rawness, etc. it's just rock and roll.